4.7 Article

Robust multi objective optimization of anisotropic yield function coefficients

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages 184-197

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.033

Keywords

Anisotropy; Genetic algorithm; Sheet metals; Springback; Formability; Finite element simulation

Funding

  1. Korea University, Seoul for KU grant
  2. National Research Foundation of Republic of Korea (NRF) [2017R1A2A2A05069619, 2016M1A7A1A01005904]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The coefficients of yield functions have been conventionally determined based on limited number of experiments such as yield stresses and/or R-values along different material orientations. In the present study, a multi objective genetic algorithm (MultiGA) based approach was implemented to obtain coefficients of anisotropic yield functions by simultaneous error minimization for yield stresses and R-values. Three frequently employed yield functions, Hill 1948, Barlat 1989 and Barlat Yld2000-2d, in the sheet metal forming simulations were considered. The performance of the determined coefficients for each yield function was judged by comparing the predicted yield stress and R-values with experimental values. Fundamental questions regarding the effect of experimental data on determining the coefficients were analyzed using the proposed approach. It is generally perceived that increase in experimental data enhances the accuracy of the determination of coefficients. Some counter intuitive results obtained on this regard are discussed. Finally, finite element (FE) simulations were performed to predict earing profile in deep drawn cups and springback profile for split-ring test, which were validated with experimental results. From the comparative study with conventional method and experiment, the yield function coefficients optimized by the MultiGA performed well for predicting the deformation behaviors of various anisotropic sheet metals. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available