4.7 Article

On the measurement of relative powder-bed compaction density in powder-bed additive manufacturing processes

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages 495-501

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.030

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; 3D printing; Compaction density; Selective laser melting; Laser powder-bed fusion; Hastelloy X

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev Ontario)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental studies in the literature have identified the powder-bed compaction density as an important parameter, governing the quality of additively manufactured parts. For example, in laser powder-bed fusion (LPBF), the powder-bed compaction density directly affects the effective powder thermal conductivity and consequently the temperature distribution in melt pool. In this study, this physical parameter in a LPBF build compartment is measured using a new methodology. A UV curable polymer is used to bind powder-bed particles at various locations on the powder-bed compartment when Hastelloy X was used. The samples are then scanned using a nano-computing tomography (CT) system at high resolution to obtain an estimation of the relative powder-bed compaction density. It is concluded that due to the interaction between the recoater and the variation in the powder volume accumulated ahead of the recoater across the build compartment, the relative powder-bed compaction density decreases along the recoater moving direction (from 66.4% to 52.4%.). This variation in the powder-bed compaction density affects the density and surface roughness of the final printed parts that is also investigated. Results show that the part density and surface quality decrease similar to 0.25% and similar to 20%, respectively, along the build bed in direction of the recoater motion. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available