4.7 Article

Influence of intermetallic compounds on the electrical resistivity of architectured copper clad aluminum composites elaborated by a restacking drawing method

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages 366-374

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.021

Keywords

Bimetallic composite; Architectured wire; Drawing; Intermetallic compound; Electrical resistivity

Funding

  1. Institut Carnot ESP fundings, CONDULIGHT Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Architectured wires containing 61 restacked Copper Clad Aluminum(CCA) wires were cold-drawn down to a diameter of 1 mm without intermediate annealing. Samples were taken at intermediate diameters of 3 mm and 1.7 mm to observe the wire structure at different steps. Independently of the wire diameter, the structure did not exhibit any porosity and initial CCA wires were uniformly distributed inside the structure with constant equivalent diameters. Post-elaboration annealing treatments performed on CCA and architectured wires led to the formation of Al2Cu, AlCu and Al4Cu9 intermetallic compounds (IMC). It was shown that IMC growth kinetics do not depend on the wire diameter, indicating no marked influence of the plastic deformation. The volume fraction of IMC strongly increased with the reduction of the diameter and impacted the electrical resistivity of the architectured wire. The equivalent resistivity has been easily computed by a linear rule of mixture model, with three electrical resistances in parallel (Al, Cu and IMC), weighted by their respective volume fraction. This model allowed extracting a mean resistivity of IMCs of 4.5 mu Omega.cm. It also demonstrated that this restacking drawing process, without any intermediate annealing treatment is an interesting method for the elaboration of architectured wires with optimized functional properties. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available