4.7 Article

Effect of pyrolytic carbon interface thickness on conductivity and mechanical and wear properties of copper mesh modified carbon/carbon composite

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 154, Issue -, Pages 302-311

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.031

Keywords

Copper fiber; Carbon fiber; Wear; Electric current; Pyrolytic carbon interface

Funding

  1. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Technology and Application of Metal Toughening, Guangdong Institute of Materials and processing [GKL201605]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2017JJ3514]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51302322]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon fiber/copper fiber-reinforced carbon matrix composite, a kind of novel sliding contact stripmaterial, was fabricated using a chemical vapor infiltration (CVI) technology, following by furan resin impregnation and carbonization processes. To improve the interface combination, pyrolytic carbon (PyC) with different layer thicknesses (0-18.86 mu m) were formed on the copper and carbon fiber surfaces via controlling deposition time of the CVI. Microstructure, electrical conductivity, flexural strength and current-carrying friction performances were investigated. The results showed the dominant affecting factor on the material performances was the microstructure of matrix carbon. The electrical conductivity increased with increasing of the PyC layer thickness, whichwas an approximate linear collection. As compared to the onewithout the PyC interface, Cf/Cuf-C composites with PyC interface increased flexural strength and wear resistance by more than two times owing to the effective protection for carbon fibers and copper fibers. In addition, three physical models were used to describe wear mechanisms of Cf/Cuf-C composites with different PyC layer thicknesses. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available