4.7 Article

Damage response of composites coated with conducting materials subjected to emulated lightning strikes

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages 45-55

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.017

Keywords

Coatings; Composites; Current; Damage analysis; Lightning; Resistance; Resistivity; Thermography; Ultrasonic

Funding

  1. CRIAQ NSERC COMP-502 project [CRDPJ418046-11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lightning strike protection (LSP) offered by two different classes of conductive coatings deposited on carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) panels was studied in three stages: (i) emulated lightning impulse strikes, (ii) conducted continuous currents, and (iii) physical aspects of lightning-coating interaction. Two types of coatings, hybrid and metallic were studied. Hybrid (multi-material) coatings consisted of silver nanoparticles dispersed in conducting polymer PEDOT:PSS, and silver-coated carbon-nanofiber transferred onto an epoxy surfacing film. For metallic coatings, continuous coatings of silver, and a composite of 10% copper in tin were considered. We evaluate the material design schemes of these two classes of materials based on the degree of protection offered to the composite substrates from emulated lightning strikes. Two additional cases, CFRP with an epoxy surfacing film and a continuous coating of tin were also studied, while expanded copper foil (ECF)-protected and unprotected CFRP formed the reference materials. Continuous metallic coatings outperformed their hybrid counterparts, although none of the materials was comparable to ECF in terms of LSP performance. This work demonstrates the limitations of electrical resistivity and/or sheet resistance measurements to provide a reliable estimate about the performance of conductive coatings and that emulated lightning strikes are crucial for assessment of lightning protection. (c) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available