4.7 Article Data Paper

Global quantitative analysis of the human brain proteome in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.36

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Accelerating Medicine Partnership AD grant [U01AG046161]
  2. NINDS Emory Neuroscience Core [P30NS055077]
  3. National Institute on Aging [R01AG053960]
  4. Emory Alzheimer's Disease Research Center [P50AG025688]
  5. Alzheimer's Association (ALZ)
  6. Alzheimer's Research UK (ARUK)
  7. Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research (MJFF)
  8. Weston Brain Institute Biomarkers Across Neurodegenerative Diseases [11060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) often have overlap in clinical presentation and brain neuropathology suggesting that these two diseases share common underlying mechanisms. Currently, the molecular pathways linking AD and PD are incompletely understood. Utilizing Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) isobaric labeling and synchronous precursor selection-based MS3 (SPS-MS3) mass spectrometry, we performed an unbiased quantitative proteomic analysis of post-mortem human brain tissues (n = 80) from four different groups defined as controls, AD, PD, and co-morbid AD/PD cases across two brain regions (frontal cortex and anterior cingulate gyrus). In total, we identified 11 840 protein groups representing 10 230 gene symbols, which map to similar to 65% of the protein coding genes in brain. The utility of including two reference standards in each TMT 10-plex assay to assess intra-and inter-batch variance is also described. Ultimately, this comprehensive human brain proteomic dataset serves as a valuable resource for various research endeavors including, but not limited to, the identification of disease-specific protein signatures and molecular pathways that are common in AD and PD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available