4.7 Article

Strain and grain size of TiO2 nanoparticles from TEM, Raman spectroscopy and XRD: The revisiting of the Williamson-Hall plot method

Journal

RESULTS IN PHYSICS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 628-635

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.03.008

Keywords

Williamson-Hall; Scherrer; Particle; Crystallite; Strain; Size

Funding

  1. South Africa-Taiwan Bilateral Programme through the National Research Foundation (NRF) in Pretoria, South Africa [HGER31X]
  2. South Africa- Egypt Bilateral Programme through the National Research Foundation (NRF) in Pretoria, South Africa [HGER40X]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Williamson-Hall (W-H) equation, which has been used to obtain relative crystallite sizes and strains between samples since 1962, is revisited. A modified W-H equation is derived which takes into account the Scherrer equation, first published in 1918, (which traditionally gives more absolute crystallite size prediction) and strain prediction from Raman spectra. It is found that W-H crystallite sizes are on average 2.11 +/- 0.01 times smaller than the sizes from Scherrer equation. Furthermore the strain from the W-H plots when compared to strain obtained from Raman spectral red-shifts yield factors whose values depend on the phases in the materials - whether anatase, rutile or brookite. Two main phases are identified in the annealing temperatures (350 degrees C-700 degrees C) chosen herein - anatase and brookite. A transition temperature of 550 degrees C has been found for nano-TiO2 to irreversibly transform from brookite to anatase by plotting the Raman peak shifts against the annealing temperatures. The W-H underestimation on the strain in the brookite phase gives W-H/Raman factor of 3.10 +/- 0.05 whereas for the anatase phase, one gets 2.46 +/- 0.03. The new beta(2)(tot)cos(2)theta-sin theta plot and when fitted with a polynomial yield less strain but much better matching with experimental TEM crystallite sizes and the agglomerates than both the traditional Williamson-Hall and the Scherrer methods. There is greater improvement in the model when linearized that is the beta(tot)cos(2)theta-sin theta plot rather than the beta(2)(tot)cos(2)theta-sin theta plot. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available