4.7 Article

Exercise increases circulating GDF15 in humans

Journal

MOLECULAR METABOLISM
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 187-191

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.12.016

Keywords

Skeletal muscle; Growth differentiation factor 15; Recovery; Physical activity

Funding

  1. Novo-Nordisk A/S
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research/Medicine [4004-00233, 4092-00309]
  3. Lundbeck Foundation [R238-2016-2859]
  4. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF170C0026114]
  5. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  6. Lundbeck Foundation [R238-2016-2859] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. NNF Center for Basic Metabolic Research [Clemmensen Group] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF17OC0026114] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) is a stress-sensitive circulating factor that regulates systemic energy balance. Since exercise is a transient physiological stress that has pleiotropic effects on whole-body energy metabolism, we herein explored the effect of exercise on a) circulating GDF15 levels and b) GDF15 release from skeletal muscle in humans. Methods: Seven healthy males either rested or exercised at 67% of their VO2max for 1 h and blood was sampled from the femoral artery and femoral vein before, during, and after exercise. Plasma GDF15 concentrations were determined in these samples. Results: Plasma GDF15 levels increased 34% with exercise (p < 0.001) and further increased to 64% above resting values at 120 min (p < 0.001) after the cessation of exercise. There was no difference between the arterial and venous GDF15 concentration before, during, and after exercise. During a resting control trial, GDF15 levels measured in the same subjects were unaltered. Conclusions: Vigorous submaximal exercise increases circulating GDF15 levels in humans, but skeletal muscle tissue does not appear to be the source. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available