4.2 Article

Sensitivity analysis for expected utility maximization in incomplete Brownian market models

Journal

MATHEMATICS AND FINANCIAL ECONOMICS
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 387-411

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11579-017-0209-9

Keywords

Sensitivity analysis; First order sensitivity; Utility maximization; Weak formulation

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Y782-N25]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [FA506041]
  3. Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin
  4. Berlin Mathematical School
  5. Gaspar Monge Program for Optimization and Operation Research (PGMO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examine the issue of sensitivity with respect to model parameters for the problem of utility maximization from final wealth in an incomplete Samuelson model and mainly, but not exclusively, for utility functions of positive-power type. The method consists in moving the parameters through change of measure, which we call a weak perturbation, decoupling the usual wealth equation from the varying parameters. By rewriting the maximization problem in terms of a convex-analytical support function of a weakly-compact set, crucially leveraging on the work (Backhoff and Fontbona in SIAM J Financ Math 7(1): 70103, 2016), the previous formulation let us prove the Hadamard directional differentiability of the value function with respect to the market price of risk, the drift and interest rate parameters, as well as for volatility matrices under a stability condition on their Kernel, and derive explicit expressions for the directional derivatives. We contrast our proposed weak perturbations against what we call strong perturbations, where the wealth equation is directly influenced by the changing parameters. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find that both points of view generally yield different sensitivities unless e.g. if initial parameters and their perturbations are deterministic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available