4.5 Article

Finite element analysis of composite laminates subjected to low-velocity impact based on multiple failure criteria

Journal

MATERIALS RESEARCH EXPRESS
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/aacca3

Keywords

composite laminates; low-velocity impact; failure criteria; analytical approximation; computational cost

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0805601, 2017YFC0805605]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Progressive damage models based on continuum damage mechanics are used in combination with cohesive elements to explore the effect of three different failure criteria including Chang-Chang, Hashin and Puck criteria, on the structural response and the failure mechanisms of composite laminates subjected to low-velocity impact. Three different failure criteria and damage evolution laws based on equivalent strain are used for intralaminar damage models, and the delamination is simulated by the bilinear cohesive model based on quadratic criteria. A new numerical optimization method combining analytical approximation and Golden section Search has been applied in Puck criteria to search the fracture plane. Numerical analysis is performed on two composite laminates specimens with different materials, layups and impact energy to study the impact force-time, force-displacement and absorbed energy, computational cost, as well as the damage evolution behaviors of fiber, matrix and delamination. The numerical results with three different failure criteria show acceptable accord with available experimental data, which validate the accuracy of the proposed damage model. Moreover, this research can be helpful to select appropriate failure criteria in the progressive failure analysis of composite laminates under low velocity impact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available