4.2 Article

Performance of quartz- and sapphire-based double-crystal high-resolution (≈10 meV) RIXS monochromators under varying power loads

Journal

JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION
Volume 25, Issue -, Pages 1030-1035

Publisher

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S1600577518005945

Keywords

X-ray optics; resonant inelastic X-ray scattering; RIXS; non-traditional crystal materials; high-resolution monochromators

Funding

  1. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the context of a novel, high-resolution resonant inelastic X-ray scattering spectrometer, a flat-crystal-based quartz analyzer system has recently been demonstrated to provide an unprecedented intrinsic-energy resolution of 3.9meV at the Ir L-3 absorption edge (11.215keV) [Kim et al. (2018) Sci. Rep.8, 1958]. However, the overall instrument resolution was limited to 9.7meV because of an 8.9meV incident band pass, generated by the available high-resolution four-bounce Si(844) monochromator. In order to better match the potent resolving power of the novel analyzer with the energy band pass of the incident beam, a quartz(309)-based double-bounce, high-resolution monochromator was designed and implemented, expected to yield an overall instrument resolution of 6.0meV. The choice of lower-symmetry quartz is very attractive because of its wealth of suitable near-backscattering reflections. However, it was found that during room-temperature operation typical levels of incident power, barely affecting the Si monochromator, caused substantial thermal distortions in the first crystal of the quartz monochromator, rendering it practically unusable. Finite-element analyses and heat-flow analyses corroborate this finding. As a high-flux, lower resolution (15.8meV) alternative, a two-bounce sapphire(078) version was also tested and found to be less affected than quartz, but notably more than silicon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available