4.6 Article

Numerical and experimental analysis of strip cross-directional control and flatness prediction for UCM cold rolling mill

Journal

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages 637-649

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.07.008

Keywords

Simulation modeling; Elastic-plastic FEM; UCM mill; Strip shape; Flatness actuator efficiency

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51774084, 51634002]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0304100]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N160704004, N170708020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In cold rolling of strip, flatness defects typically appear in strip when subjected to heterogeneous thickness reductions across the width of strip. As crown and flatness are interrelated, the crown ratio variation is used to qualitatively predict flatness defect mode. An investigation on the shape prediction and control of strip is presented in this paper. Taking these purposes into account, a three-dimensional finite element model for the Universal Crown Control mill (UCM mill) and strip containing different basic crown patterns is developed, and applied to two questions, namely prediction of flatness defect position and analysis of actuator control efficiency. The results indicate that the approach of crown ratio factor only gives the prediction for the edge and center waves, but it can't distinguish quarter-wave. Therefore, an improved approach based on the varying curve of crown ratio, which can give the location of the flatness defect in more detail, is proposed. Moreover, combined with the study concerning control feature and capacity on thickness profile and flatness of strip, an original solution for obtaining the actuator efficiency factor is implemented. Finally, the curve of actuator efficiency factor obtained by the model is tested online in a flatness closed-loop control system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available