4.6 Article

Dissimilar joining of CSEF steels using autogenous tungsten-inert gas welding and gas tungsten arc welding and their effect on δ-ferrite evolution and mechanical properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Volume 31, Issue -, Pages 247-259

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.11.020

Keywords

A-TIG; GTA; Hardness; Charpy toughness; Microstructure; Weldments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ferritic/martensitic 9Cr-1 Mo-V-Nb steel also designated as ASTM A335 used in construction of several components of power plants operating in temperature range of 600-650 degrees C. In present investigation, dissimilar weld joints of P91 and P92 steel were prepared using the autogenous tungsten inert gas welding (A-TIG) and multi-pass gas tungsten arc (GTA) welding process. A comparative was performed on evolution of delta-ferrite patches in weld fusion zone and heat affected zone (HAZ) of welded joints. The evolution of delta-ferrite patches was carried out in as-welded and post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) condition. PWHT was carried out at 760 degrees C for 2 h for both A-TIG and GTA welding process. For A-TIG weld joint higher yield strength, ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and peak hardness were measured due to higher heat input in single pass and higher carbon content in weld fusion zone. Higher heat input, fast cooling rate and higher weight percentage of ferrite stabilizer like vanadium (V) and niobium (Nb) in A-TIG weld joint were resulted in formation ferrite patches in weld fusion zone and heat affected zone. Higher weight percentage of V and Nb in A-TIG weld zone was resulted poor impact toughness of A-TIG weld fusion zone than GTA welds in as-welded condition. After the PWHT at 760 degrees C-2 h, Charpy toughness of A-TIG weld fusion zone (48 J) just meet the minimum required value as required by the EN: 1557:1997 (47 J). (C) 2018 The Society of Manufacturing Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available