4.6 Article

Antibiotic susceptibility of 259 Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from food, food-processing plants and human samples in Germany

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 572-577

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.12.007

Keywords

Antibiotic resistance; Antimicrobials; Germany; Listeria monocytogenes; Susceptibility testing

Funding

  1. German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment [47-003, 1329-524]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the susceptibility of 259 Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from food and food-processing environments and patient samples in Germany to 14 antibiotics widely used in veterinary and human medicine. L. monocytogenes strains were isolated mainly from milk and milk products and classified according to their molecular serotypes IIa (n = 112), IIb (n = 41), IIc (n = 36), IVa (n = 1), IVb (n = 66), and IVb-v1 (n = 3). Methods: Susceptibility tests were performed by using the automated 96-well based microdilution system Micronaut-S. Ampicillin, benzylpenicillin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, daptomycin, erythromcyin, gentamicin, linezolid, meropenem, rifampicin, tetracycline, tigecycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and vancomycin were tested in at least five different concentrations. Results: Among the 259 strains under study, 145 strains revealed multidrug-resistance (resistance to >= 3 antibiotics) and predominantly belonged to serotype IV (59%). Strains were mainly resistant to daptomycin, tigecycline, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, trimethropim/sulfamethoxazole and gentamicin. Conclusions: Antibiotic resistance in general and multidrug-resistance in particular were more prevalent in L. monocytogenes strains isolated in Germany compared to similar reference stocks from other European countries and the USA but similar to stocks from China. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Limited on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available