3.9 Article

Muscle Invasion in Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma as a Predictor of Nodal Status and Local Recurrence: Just as Effective as Depth of Invasion

Journal

HEAD & NECK PATHOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 359-363

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-011-0296-5

Keywords

Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Tongue; Depth of invasion; Muscle invasion; Oral cancer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor depth of invasion (DOI) is a histologic feature that consistently correlates with lymph node metastasis; however, there are many difficulties with accurately assessing DOI. The aim of this study was to identify a simpler and more reproducible method of determining DOI, by using skeletal muscle invasion as a surrogate marker of depth. Oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage T1 cases were identified in the Emory University Department of Pathology database. 61 cases, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, were included in the study. Cases were examined histologically to assess muscle invasion and DOI. The two methods of measurement were analyzed to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of DOI or muscle invasion for both nodal disease and local recurrence. Cases with muscle invasion had a 23.3% PPV of occult lymph node metastasis. Cases with DOI of greater than 3 mm had a 29.7% PPV of occult lymph node metastasis. Cases with muscle invasion had a 43.7% PPV of local tumor recurrence. Cases with maximum DOI of greater than 3 mm had a 40.4% PPV of tumor recurrence. Although the PPV of muscle invasion in regards to nodal status was slightly less than DOI, it represents a more easily reproducible parameter which could guide surgeons in determining if the case warrants an elective neck dissection in a cN0 (clinically negative) neck. Interestingly, the PPV of local recurrence was higher with muscle invasion than DOI, and may represent an important indicator for extent of resection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available