4.6 Article

Effect of increasing densities of Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu on Eucalyptus urograndis initial development in silvopastoral system

Journal

JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 537-543

Publisher

NORTHEAST FORESTRY UNIV
DOI: 10.1007/s11676-018-0635-4

Keywords

Eucalyptus; Palisade grass; Competition; Interference

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In silvopasture system, the coexistence of eucalyptus seedlings with other species may result in growth reduction, especially during eucalyptus early development. Therefore, studies elucidating how forage species affect the eucalyptus growth can provide important information for their rational management aiming to obtain the maximum gain of the system. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of increasing densities of Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu in the early development of Eucalyptus urograndis. An experiment was conducted in 20 L pots, in an open and semi-controlled area, during 90days after planting of eucalyptus. A completely randomized design with four replications was used, in a 6x7 factorial system, meaning six evaluation periods and seven densities of U. brizantha: 0 (control), 22, 33, 44, 67, 89 and 111plantsm(-2). Fortnightly, eucalyptus height, stem diameter and chlorophyll fluorescence (F-v/F-m) were evaluated. At the end of experimental period, the net assimilation rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of eucalyptus plants were determined, in addition to the dry matter of eucalyptus (leaves and stem) and U. brizantha (leaves). In coexistence with 111plantsm(-2), eucalyptus had reduction of 63.9% on total dry matter and 72.7% on leaf area, compared to the control. From the density of 22plantsm(-2), U. brizantha negatively interfere significantly the growth of E. urograndis. Up to 8plantsm(-2) there are no reductions greater than 5% in eucalyptus height and stem diameter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available