4.7 Article

Efficient elimination of U(VI) by polyethyleneimine-decorated fly ash

Journal

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages 2399-2407

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8qi00253c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0207002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21577032, 21607042]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018ZD11, 2018MS114, 2016MS02]
  4. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The toxicity and radioactivity of uranium (U-235,U-238(VI)) has resulted in serious environmental issues in recent years. Polyethyleneimine-decorated waste fly ash (FA@PEI) from thermal power plants has been fabricated via a novel and cost-efficient method and applied to the U(VI) elimination from aqueous solutions by batch experiments. The U(VI) removal was found to be dramatically influenced by pH whilst being ionic strength-independent, which indicated that the interaction was primarily controlled by inner-sphere surface complexation. Kinetic studies showed that the FA@PEI had an ultrafast removal rate (1.5 h to achieve adsorption equilibration) for U(VI) and a pseudo-second-order model fitted the adsorption process. The maximum removal capacity of U(VI) by FA@PEI was 70.3 mg g(-1) at 298 K and pH 5.0. Based on the thermodynamics data (Delta H degrees > 0, Delta S degrees > 0 and Delta G degrees < 0), the U(VI) removal process is typically spontaneous and endothermic. According to the XPS analysis, the enhanced U(VI) adsorption was mainly attributed to the abundant metal oxide bonds and amine groups (-NH2, -NH-). Furthermore, the FA@PEI material also demonstrated an outstanding regeneration ability. This paper highlights FA@PEI as an environmentally-friendly and economical alternative for U(VI) elimination from waste water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available