4.6 Article

False-Positive Reduction on Lung Nodules Detection in Chest Radiographs by Ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networks

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 16060-16067

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2817023

Keywords

Chest radiographs (CXRs); lung nodules detection; convolutional neural network (CNN); ensemble learning

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61771223]
  2. NSF of Hebei Province [F2016202144]
  3. Department of Education of Hebei Province [QN2016217]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aiming at the problem that traditional lung nodules detection method can only get low sensitivities with a lot of false positives, we propose a new framework of ensemble of convolutional neural networks (E-CNNs) and use it to significantly reduce the number of false positive on lung nodules detection in chest radiographs (CXRs). First, unsharp mask technique is used to enhance the nodules in the CXRs. Then, we cut patches in the 229 x 229 image containing or not containing nodule from the enhanced CXRs, which correspond to the positive and negative samples. Third, three optimized CNNs of different input sizes and different depths, namely, CNN1, CNN2 and CNN3, are constructed to detect lung nodule separately, and their input sizes are 12 x 12, 32 x 32, and 60 x 60, and the number of layers are 5, 7, and 9, separately. Finally, a logical AND operator is used to fuse the results of CNN1, CNN2, and CNN3, and E-CNNs are constructed for detecting lung nodules. Our experimental results on the Japanese Society of Radiological Technology database show our proposed E-CNNs attain a sensitivity of 94% and 84% with an average of 5.0 false-positives (FPs) per image and 2.0 FPs per image, respectively, in a five-fold cross-validation test, which far outperforms the state of the art.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available