4.5 Article

A combined ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis process for external reuse of Weiyuan shale gas flowback and produced water

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ew00036k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678377, 51708371]
  2. Sichuan University Outstanding Youth Foundation [2015SCU04A35]
  3. Applied Basic Research Program of Sichuan Province [2017JY0238]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M612965]
  5. Full-time Postdoctoral Foundation of Sichuan University [2017SCU12019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The management of large volumes of flowback and produced water (FPW) generated in shale gas extraction is of great concern due to the high concentrations of total dissolved solids (TDS), scale forming constituents, and organics. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of a combined ultrafiltration (UF) and reverse osmosis (RO) process for treating FPW from the Weiyuan shale gas play, China. Under a constant pressure of 4.5 MPa, the RO process decreased the concentrations of TDS, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and Cl-to 192, 7.5 and 97 mg L-1 from 18900, 530 and 11000 mg L-1 in the feed, respectively. The effluent of the combined process met the requirements for surface water discharge and agriculture irrigation in China. The total fouling index of the UF membrane over a range of permeate fluxes suggests a critical flux of around 19 L m-2 h-1; operation at a low flux was effective for UF fouling control. The operating pressure and recovery of the RO system significantly affected the permeate flux and quality, with both the flux and rejection increasing with increasing operating pressure but decreasing with increasing recovery. Moreover, CaCO3 and BaCO3 crystals were identified on the RO membrane surface at high recovery. The rejection data for TDS and COD by the RO membrane were consistent with the SpieglerKedem membrane transport model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available