4.7 Article

Unified Codebook Design for Vector Channel Quantization in MIMO Broadcast Channels

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 63, Issue 10, Pages 2509-2519

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2015.2414895

Keywords

Multiple antennas; limited feedback; codebook design; channel quantization

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant - Korean Government (MSIP) [2014R1A5A1011478]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014R1A5A1011478] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we propose a two-stage vector channel quantizer for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) broadcast channels with limited feedback. When the number of total users is larger than the number of transmit antennas, the users to be served are selected and then the selected users are supported by beam-forming based on quantized feedback information. If channel gain information (CGI) and channel direction information (CDI) are independently quantized with a product codebook, as in conventional channel quantization, we show that the effect of CDI quantization errors is boosted by the CGI value, which becomes more pronounced as the number of users increases because the selected users are likely to have larger CGI than the others. Motivated by the analysis, we devise a new two-stage quantizer where CGI is quantized at the first stage, and then CDI is adaptively quantized at the second stage according to the quantized CGI value and total number of users. We optimize the two-stage quantizer for an arbitrarily given CGI quantizer and the number of total users. It is demonstrated that for the same feedback size, the proposed quantizer markedly improves conventional quantization with a product codebook in terms of average sum rate in MIMO BC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available