4.7 Review

Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: A systematic review

Journal

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
Volume 31, Issue -, Pages 58-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.015

Keywords

Ecosystem valuation; Gender equity; Sustainable Development Goals

Funding

  1. CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE) through the project A generic ABM framework for complex ecosystem service analyses in WLE focal regions
  2. CGIAR Fund
  3. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT)
  4. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  5. Netherlands Directorate-General for International Cooperation (DGIS)
  6. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
  7. Swiss Agency for Development Cooperation (Styrelsen for Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Women and men often have differential access to and derive different benefits from ecosystem services; therefore, their perception and knowledge of ecosystem services also differ. Understanding these differences is critical to ensuring that policies aimed at enhancing access to and use of ecosystem services can provide benefits to all genders. We conducted a systematic review of studies that aim to understand the relationship between gender and ecosystem service perceptions to summarize research from this emerging topic and to identify patterns between gender and ecosystem service perceptions from different case studies. The results show that highly gendered ecosystem services include medicinal products from forest or mangrove ecosystems and freshwater supply. Women have a stronger perception of water quality and erosion control, soil formation, habitat conservation and sustaining biodiversity. Men, on the other hand, had more knowledge of fuel and timber and extreme event mitigation services. Our review also identifies the limitations of sample size for this interdisciplinary topic, calls for more case studies and comparative studies to identify relationships between gender and ecosystem service perceptions, and calls for the development of models on ecosystem services that incorporate gender. Finally, we discuss how our review can augment existing gender frameworks for policymaking. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available