4.7 Article

21st Century Sea-Level Rise in Line with the Paris Accord

Journal

EARTHS FUTURE
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 213-229

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017EF000688

Keywords

Sea-level Projections; Paris Agreement

Funding

  1. Natural Environmental Research Council [NE/P01517/1]
  2. Robertson Foundation [9907422]
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [noc010012, NE/P015107/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Villum Fonden [00016572] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [NE/P015107/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As global average sea-level rises in the early part of this century there is great interest in how much global and local sea level will change in the forthcoming decades. The Paris Climate Agreement's proposed temperature thresholds of 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C have directed the research community to ask what differences occur in the climate system for these two states. We have developed a novel approach to combine climate model outputs that follow specific temperature pathways to make probabilistic projections of sea-level in a 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C world. We find median global sea-level (GSL) projections for 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C temperature pathways of 44 and 50 cm, respectively. The 90% uncertainty ranges (5%-95%) are both around 48 cm by 2100. In addition, we take an alternative approach to estimate the contribution from ice sheets by using a semi-empirical GSL model. Here we find median projections of 58 and 68 cm for 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C temperature pathways. The 90% uncertainty ranges are 67 and 82 cm respectively. Regional projections show similar patterns for both temperature pathways, though differences vary between the median projections (2-10 cm) and 95th percentile (5-20 cm) for the bulk of oceans using process-based approach and 10-15 cm (median) and 15-25 cm (95th percentile) using the semi-empirical approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available