4.6 Review

Stem cells technology: a powerful tool behind new brain treatments

Journal

DRUG DELIVERY AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 1564-1591

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13346-018-0548-y

Keywords

Stern cells; Brain injuries; Neurodegenerative diseases; Regenerative medicine; High-throughput screening; Lab-on-a-chip

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81671268]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology China [2013YQ03059594]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stem cell research has recently become a hot research topic in biomedical research due to the foreseen unlimited potential of stem cells in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. For many years, medicine has been facing intense challenges, such as an insufficient number of organ donations that is preventing clinicians to fulfill the increasing needs. To try and overcome this regrettable matter, research has been aiming at developing strategies to facilitate the in vitro culture and study of stem cells as a tool for tissue regeneration. Meanwhile, new developments in the microfluidics technology brought forward emerging cell culture applications that are currently allowing for a better chemical and physical control of cellular microenvironment. This review presents the latest developments in stem cell research that brought new therapies to the clinics and how the convergence of the microfluidics technology with stem cell research can have positive outcomes on the fields of regenerative medicine and high-throughput screening. These advances will bring new translational solutions for drug discovery and will upgrade in vitro cell culture to a new level of accuracy and performance. We hope this review will provide new insights into the understanding of new brain treatments from the perspective of stem cell technology especially regarding regenerative medicine and tissue engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available