4.2 Review

Mechanical Stimuli in the Local In Vivo Environment in Bone: Computational Approaches Linking Organ-Scale Loads to Cellular Signals

Journal

CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 395-403

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11914-018-0448-6

Keywords

Mechanical stimulation; Osteocytes; Computational systems biomechanics; Local in vivo environment; Bone (re)modelling

Funding

  1. European Union [ERC-2016-ADG-741883, WHRI-ACADEMY-608765]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Connecting organ-scale loads to cellular signals in their local in vivo environment is a current challenge in the field of bone (re)modelling. Understanding this critical missing link would greatly improve our ability to anticipate mechanotransduction during different modes of stimuli and the resultant cellular responses. This review characterises computational approaches that could enable coupling links across the multiple scales of bone. Current approaches using strain and fluid shear stress concepts have begun to link organ-scale loads to cellular signals; however, these approaches fail to capture localised micro-structural heterogeneities. Furthermore, models that incorporate downstream communication from osteocytes to osteoclasts, bone-lining cells and osteoblasts, will help improve the understanding of (re)modelling activities. Incorporating this potentially key information in the local in vivo environment will aid in developing multiscale models of mechanotransduction that can predict or help describe resultant biological events related to bone (re)modelling. Progress towards multiscale determination of the cell mechanical environment from organ-scale loads remains elusive. Construction of organ-, tissue- and cell-scale computational models that include localised environmental variation, strain amplification and intercellular communication mechanisms will ultimately help couple the hierarchal levels of bone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available