4.8 Article

3D CNTs/Graphene-S-Al3Ni2 Cathodes for High-Sulfur-Loading and Long-Life Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Journal

ADVANCED SCIENCE
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201800026

Keywords

Al3Ni2; graphene; high areal sulfur loading; lithium-sulfur batteries; polysulfides

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51741207, 51572197, 21475096, 51420105002]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province for Distinguished Young Scholars [LR18E020001]
  3. Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province [LGF18B050005]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Structural Chemistry [20170035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-sulfur batteries suffer from poor cycling stability at high areal sulfur loadings (ASLs) mainly because of the infamous shuttle problem and the increasing diffusion distance for ions to diffuse along the vertical direction of the cathode plane. Here, a carbon nanotube (CNT)/graphene (Gra)-S-Al3Ni2 cathode with 3D network structure is designed and prepared. The 3D network configuration and the Al in the Al3Ni2 provide an efficient channel for fast electron and ion transfer in the three dimensions, especially along the vertical direction of the cathode. The introduction of Ni in the Al3Ni2 is able to suppress the shuttle effect via accelerating reaction kinetics of lithium polysulfide species conversion reactions. The CNT/Gra-S-Al3Ni2 cathode exhibits ultrahigh cycle-ability at 1 C over 800 cycles, with a capacity degradation rate of 0.055% per cycle. Additionally, having high ASLs of 3.3 mg cm(-2), the electrode delivers a high reversible areal capacity of 2.05 mA h cm(-2) (622 mA h g(-1)) over 200 cycles at a higher current density of 2.76 mA cm(-2) with high capacity retention of 85.9%. The outstanding discharge performance indicates that the design offers a promising avenue to develop long-life cycle and high-sulfur-loading Li-S batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available