Journal
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages 1065-1078Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/656570
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Consumers may consume the same products or services with different goals, for example, for their own pleasure-a hedonic goal-or to achieve some higher level purpose-a utilitarian goal. This article investigates whether this difference in goals influences satisfaction with an outcome that was either self-chosen or externally determined. In four experiments we manipulate consumption goals, controlling for the outcomes, the option valence, and whether the externally made choice was determined by an expert or at random. Results show that the outcome of a self-made choice is more satisfying than the outcome of an externally made choice when the goal is hedonic but not when it is utilitarian. We hypothesize that this effect results from the greater perceived personal causality associated with terminally motivated activities, such as hedonic choices, relative to instrumentally motivated activities, such as utilitarian choices, and provide evidence that supports this explanation over alternative accounts.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available