4.5 Article

Primordial black holes survive SN lensing constraints

Journal

PHYSICS OF THE DARK UNIVERSE
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages 95-100

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.dark.2018.04.005

Keywords

Primordial black holes; Dark matter; Gravitational lensing

Funding

  1. MINECO-FEDER [FPA2015-68048-03-3P]
  2. Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa Program [SEV-2016-0597]
  3. Salvador de Madariaga Program [PRX17/00056]
  4. Charge de Recherche grant of the Belgian Fund for Research FRS/FNRS
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been claimed in [aixiv:1712.02240] that massive primordial black holes (PBH) cannot constitute all of the dark matter (DM), because their gravitational-lensing imprint on the Hubble diagram of type la supernovae (SN) would be incompatible with present observations. In this note, we critically review those constraints and find several caveats on the analysis. First of all, the constraints on the fraction alpha of PBH in matter seem to be driven by a very restrictive choice of priors on the cosmological parameters. In particular, the degeneracy between Omega(m) and alpha was ignored and thus, by fixing Omega(m), transferred the constraining power of SN magnitudes to alpha. Furthermore, by considering more realistic physical sizes for the type-la supernovae, we find an effect on the SN lensing magnification distribution that leads to significantly looser constraints. Moreover, considering a wide mass spectrum of PBH, such as a lognormal distribution, further softens the constraints from SN lensing. Finally, we find that the fraction of PBH that could constitute DM today is bounded by f(pBH) < 1.09 (1.38), for JLA (Union 2.1) catalogs, and thus it is perfectly compatible with an all-PBH dark matter scenario in the LIGO band. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available