4.6 Article

A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology

Journal

PEERJ
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4794

Keywords

GLMM; Mixed effects models; Model selection; AIC; Multi-model inference; Overdispersion; Model averaging; Random effects; Collinearity; Type I error

Funding

  1. Institute of Zoology Research Fellowship
  2. NERC [NE/H02249X/1, NE/L501669/1]
  3. University of Exeter
  4. Animal and Plant Health Agency as part of 'Wildlife Research Co-Operative'
  5. CONACYT (The Mexican National Council for Science and Technology)
  6. SEP (The Mexican Ministry of Education)
  7. Forestry Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of linear mixed effects models (LMMs) is increasingly common in the analysis of biological data. Whilst LMMs offer a flexible approach to modelling a broad range of data types, ecological data are often complex and require complex model structures, and the fitting and interpretation of such models is not always straightforward. The ability to achieve robust biological inference requires that practitioners know how and when to apply these tools. Here, we provide a general overview of current methods for the application of LMMs to biological data, and highlight the typical pitfalls that can be encountered in the statistical modelling process. We tackle several issues regarding methods of model selection, with particular reference to the use of information theory and multi-model inference in ecology. We offer practical solutions and direct the reader to key references that provide further technical detail for those seeking a deeper understanding. This overview should serve as a widely accessible code of best practice for applying LMMs to complex biological problems and model structures, and in doing so improve the robustness of conclusions drawn from studies investigating ecological and evolutionary questions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available