4.7 Article

Increasing the Flexibility of Combined Heat and Power for Wind Power Integration in China: Modeling and Implications

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 1848-1857

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2356723

Keywords

Combined heat and power (CHP); energy system integration; heat storage; wind power

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51325702]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2011AA05A101]
  3. State Grid Corporation of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the largest installed capacity in the world, wind power in China is experiencing a curtailment during operation. The large portion of the generation capacity from inflexible combined heat and power (CHP) is the major barrier for integrating this variable power source. This paper explores opportunities for increasing the flexibility of CHP units using electrical boilers and heat storage tanks for better integration of wind power. A linear model is proposed for the centralized dispatch for integrated energy systems considering both heat and power, with detailed modeling of the charging processes of the heat storage tanks. The model balances heat and power demands in multiple areas and time periods with various energy sources, including CHP, wind power, electrical boilers, and heat storage. The impact of introducing electrical boilers and heat storage systems is examined using a simple test system with characteristics similar to those of the power systems in Northern China. Our results show that both electrical boilers and heat storage tanks can improve the flexibility of CHP units: introducing electrical boilers is more effective at reducing wind curtailment, whereas heat storage tanks save more energy in the energy system as a whole, which reflect a different heating efficiency of the two solutions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available