4.5 Article

Increased insula-putamen connectivity in X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism

Journal

NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages 835-846

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.025

Keywords

Striosomes; Matrix; Paralimbic; Sensorimotor; Tractography

Categories

Funding

  1. University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
  2. University of Lubeck
  3. German Research Foundation [CRC936]
  4. Collaborative Center for X-linked Dystonia-Parkinsonism (XDP) at Massachusetts General Hospital
  5. Hermann and Lilly Schilling Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preliminary evidence from postmortem studies of X- linked dystonia- parkinsonism (XDP) suggests tissue loss may occur first and/or most severely in the striatal striosome compartment, followed later by cell loss in the matrix compartment. However, little is known about how this relates to pathogenesis and pathophysiology. While MRI cannot visualize these striatal compartments directly in humans, differences in relative gradients of afferent cortical connectivity across compartments (weighted toward paralimbic versus sensorimotor cortex, respectively) can be used to infer potential selective loss in vivo. In the current study we evaluated relative connectivity of paralimbic versus sensorimotor cortex with the caudate and putamen in 17 individuals with XDP and 17 matched controls. Although caudate and putamen volumes were reduced in XDP, there were no significant reductions in either matrix-weighted, or striosome-weighted connectivity. In fact, paralimbic connectivity with the putamen was elevated, rather than reduced, in XDP. This was driven most strongly by elevated putamen connectivity with the anterior insula. There was no relationship of these findings to disease duration or striatal volume, suggesting insula and/or paralimbic connectivity in XDP may develop abnormally and/or increase in the years before symptom onset.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available