4.5 Article

Family history of alcoholism and the human brain response to oral sucrose

Journal

NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages 1036-1046

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.12.019

Keywords

Alcohol; fMRI; Sweet; Taste; Gustatory

Categories

Funding

  1. Indiana Alcohol Research Center [P60 AA07611]
  2. Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute Clinical Research Center [UL1TR001108]
  3. [R01 AA022476]
  4. [K99 AA023296]
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM [P60AA007611, R00AA023296, R01AA022476] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A heightened hedonic response to sweet tastes has been associated with increased alcohol preference and alcohol consumption in both humans and animals. The principal goal of this study was to examine blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) activation to high-and low-concentration sweet solutions in subjects who are either positive (FHP) or negative (FHN) for a family history of alcoholism. Seventy-four non-treatment seeking, community-recruited, healthy volunteers (22.8 +/- 1.6 SD years; 43% men) rated a range of sucrose concentrations in a taste test and underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during oral delivery of water, 0.83 M, and 0.10 M sucrose. Sucrose compared to water produced robust activation in primary gustatory cortex, ventral insula, amygdala, and ventral striatum. FHP subjects displayed greater bilateral amygdala activation than FHN subjects in the low sucrose concentration (0.10 M). In secondary analyses, the right amygdala response to the 0.10 M sucrose was greatest in FHP women. When accounting for group differences in drinks per week, the family history groups remained significantly different in their right amygdala response to 0.10 M sucrose. Our findings suggest that the brain response to oral sucrose differs with a family history of alcoholism, and that this response to a mildly reinforcing primary reward might be an endophenotypic marker of alcoholism risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available