4.7 Article

Generation Capacity Expansion Planning Under Hydro Uncertainty Using Stochastic Mixed Integer Programming and Scenario Reduction

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 1838-1847

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2351374

Keywords

Generation expansion planning; mathematical programming; optimization methods; scenario reduction; stochastic mixed-integer programming; uncertainty

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Generation capacity expansion planning (GCEP) is the process of deciding on a set of optimal new investments in generation capacity to adequately supply future loads, while satisfying technical and reliability constraints. This paper shows the application of stochastic mixed-integer programming (SMIP) to account for hydrological uncertainty in GCEP for the Chilean Central Interconnected System, using a two-stage SMIP multi-period model with investments and optimal power flow (OPF). The substantial computational challenges posed by GCEP imply compromising between the detail of the stochastic hydrological variables and the detail of the OPF. We selected a subset of hydrological scenarios to represent the historical hydro variability using moment-based scenario reduction techniques. The tradeoff between modeling accuracy and computational complexity was explored both regarding the simplification of the MIP problem and the differences in the variables of interest. Using a simplified OPF model, we found the difference of using a subset of hydro scenarios to be small when compared with using a full representation of the stochastic variable. Overall, SMIP with scenario reduction provided optimal capacity expansion plans whose investment plus expected operational costs were between 1.3% and 1.9% cheaper than using a deterministic approach and proved to be more robust to hydro variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available