4.3 Article

Properties of tonic episodes of masseter muscle activity during waking hours and sleep in subjects with and without history of orofacial pain

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 234-238

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.09.003

Keywords

Electromyography; Orofacial pain; Clenching; Masseter muscle; Temporomandibular disorders

Funding

  1. MEXT KAKENHI Grant [JP24390433]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To provide a scientific data related to the tonic activity of masseter muscle in subjects with and without history of orofacial pain during their normal daily life. Methods: Thirty-three subjects were divided into two groups, a pain history group (PHG) and a non-pain history group (non-PHG), based on their responses to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders questionnaire. After excluding four subjects with incomplete recordings, full-day masseter muscle surface EMGs of 29 subjects (10 men, 19 women; mean age 24.1 years) were analyzed. Tonic episode (TE) was defined as continuous EMG activity with a duration at least 2 s with intensities above twice the baseline noise level. TEs were classified into 6 strength categories (<7.5%, 7.5-10%, 10-15%, 15-25%, 25-40% and >40% of the maximum voluntary clenching (MVC)). The mean duration of activity observed in the non-PHG + 2 SD was adopted as a cutoff for identifying sustained TE. Results: During waking hours, the incidence of sustained TEs was significantly higher in the PHG than in the non-PHG (p < 0.05). The incidence and total duration of sustained TEs were significantly higher in the PHG than in the non-PHG at intensities of 7.5-10% MVC, 10-15% MVC, and 15-25% MVC (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed during sleep. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it would be concluded that sustained TEs may have a correlation with orofacial pain and the intensity range of 7.5-25% MVC would be an important range for future clenching studies (c) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Japan Prosthodontic Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available