4.4 Article

Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and carbapenemase-encoding genes in poultry faeces from Algeria and Marseille, France

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages 28-32

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.11.002

Keywords

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase; ESBL; Carbapenemase; Poultry; Algeria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)- and carbapenemase-encoding genes in poultry from Algeria and Marseille, France. Methods: Samples consisted of faeces collected from broilers in France and Algeria between 2014 and 2015. DNA extraction and quantitative PCR were performed on 833 faecal samples to screen for the presence of genes encoding ESBLs (bla(TEM), bla(SHV) and bla(CTX-M)) and carbapenemases (blanom, bla(NDM), bla(VIM), bla(KPC), bla(OXA-23), bla(OXA-24), bla(OXA-48) and bla(OXA-)(58)). To characterise bacteria carrying antimicrobial resistance genes, positive results were simultaneously sequenced. Results: All chicken faeces from Marseille were negative for ESBL- and carbapenemase-encoding genes. However, of the 503 faecal samples collected in Algeria, 128 (25.4%) were positive for bla(TEM), 83 (16.5%) for bla(S)(HV), 46 (9.1%) for bla(CTX-M) and 132 (26.2%) for bla(OXA-)(58). Using a sequencing reaction, a high diversity of ESBL genes was observed throughout the sites studied. Conclusions: This study shows a high prevalence and diversity of ESBL and carbapenemase genes in poultry faeces from Algeria, whereas none of the samples from Marseille were positive for these genes. The high prevalence of ESBLs in Algeria is in contrast to the observation that no chickens were found to be positive in France. (C) 2017 International Society for Chemotherapy of Infection and Cancer. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available