4.2 Article

Understanding and forecasting phreatic eruptions driven by magmatic degassing

Journal

EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s40623-018-0855-z

Keywords

Phreatic eruptions; Magmatic inputs; Overpressure; Sealing; Vaporization; Forecasting

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Costa Rican Ley Transitorio [8933]
  3. Deep Carbon Observatory Biology Meets Subfunction project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines phreatic eruptions which are driven by inputs of magma and magmatic gas. We synthesize data from several significant phreatic systems, including two in Costa Rica (Turrialba and Poas) which are currently highly active and hazardous. We define two endmember types of phreatic eruptions, the first (type 1) in which a deeper hydrothermal system fed by magmatic gases is sealed and produces overpressure sufficient to drive explosive eruptions, and the second (type 2) where magmatic gases are supplied via open-vent degassing to a near-surface hydrothermal system, vaporizing liquid water which drives the phreatic eruptions. The surficial source of type 2 eruptions is characteristic, while the source depth of type 1 eruptions is commonly greater. Hence, type 1 eruptions tend to be more energetic than type 2 eruptions. The first type of eruption we term phreato-vulcanian, and the second we term phreato-surtseyan. Some systems (e.g., Ruapehu, Poas) can produce both type 1 and type 2 eruptions, and all systems can undergo sealing at various timescales. We examine a number of precursory signals which appear to be important in understanding and forecasting phreatic eruptions; these include very long period events, banded tremor, and gas ratios, in particular H2S/SO2 and CO2/SO2. We propose that if these datasets are carefully integrated during a monitoring program, it may be possible to accurately forecast phreatic eruptions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available