4.6 Article

Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 SCR Catalysts: Catalytic Activity, Stability and Interaction among Catalytic Oxides

Journal

CATALYSTS
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal8020076

Keywords

composite oxide catalyst; NH3-SCR of NO; lifetime; H2O and SO2 resistance

Funding

  1. Internationl Cooperation Special of The State Ministry of Science and Technology [2015DFR60380]
  2. Advanced Technique Project Funds of The Manufacture and Information Ministry
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the central universities [HEUCF20136910012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of Mn-Ce-V-WOx/TiO2 composite oxide catalysts with different molar ratios (active components/TiO2 = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.6) have been prepared by wet impregnation method and tested in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO by NH3 in a wide temperature range. These catalysts were also characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM), in situ Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (in situ FTIR), H-2-Temperature programmed reduction (H-2-TPR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The results show the catalyst with a molar ratio of active components/TiO2 = 0.2 exhibits highest NO conversion value between 150 degrees C to 400 degrees C and good resistance to H2O and SO2 at 250 degrees C with a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) value of 40,000 h(-1). Different oxides are well dispersed and interact with each other. NH3 and NO are strongly adsorbed on the catalyst surface and the adsorption of the reactant gas leads to a redox cycle with the valence state change among the surface oxides. The adsorption of SO2 on Mn4+ and Ce4+ results in good H2O and SO2 resistance of the catalyst, but the effect of Mn and Ce are more than superior water and sulfur resistance. The diversity of valence states of the four active components and their high oxidation-reduction performance are the main reasons for the high NO conversion in this system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available