4.5 Article

In Situ Polymerization of Nanostructured Conductive Polymer on 3D Sulfur/Carbon Nanofiber Composite Network as Cathode for High-Performance Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201701598

Keywords

carbon nanofiber; in situ polymerization; lithium-sulfur batteries; polyaniline

Funding

  1. State of North Carolina
  2. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1542015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries have been considered as a promising next-generation energy storage system. However, practical application of Li-S batteries is hindered by the nonconductive nature of sulfur (S) and continuous capacity fading during cycling. Here, a simple but effective strategy is proposed to fabricate high-performance Li-S batteries by in situ polymerization of polyaniline (PANi)/S/carbon nanofiber (CNF) cathode. Compared to traditional carbon black/S cathodes and other cathode materials with PANi polymer, this effective three-dimensional (3D) cathode design has several advantages: (i) the interconnected and highly conductive CNF/PANi network structure facilitates the electron transfer between the insulating S and conductive CNF mat; (ii) the CNF/PANi network structure, with abundant oxygen and nitrogen heteroatoms, offers strong adsorption for the polysulfides; (iii) the 3D architecture of CNF/S/PANi helps accommodate the volume change of S during cycling and maintain the structural integrity of the cathode; (iv) the easy and simple fabrication process minimizes the time and energy costs; and (v) the freestanding composite cathode without additional polymer binder contributes to higher energy density of Li-S batteries. With all the advantages mentioned above, Li-S cells present a high S utilization with stable cycling performance for over 300 cycles with a low capacity decay rate of 0.08% cycle(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available