4.6 Article

Imaging Chirality of Optical Fields near Achiral Metal Nanostructures Excited with Linearly Polarized Light

Journal

ACS PHOTONICS
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 1486-1492

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01511

Keywords

chirality; optical activity; nanomaterial; plasmonics; polarimetry; scanning near-field microscope

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [JP16H06505, JP22225002, JP15H02161, JP15K13683, JP17H07330, JP15J01261]
  2. JSPS Core-to-Core Program (A. Advanced Research Networks) [JP16H06505, JP22225002, JP15H02161, JP15K13683, JP17H07330, JP15J01261]
  3. Photon Frontier Network Program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT), Japan
  4. IMS
  5. SOKENDAI
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H06503, 16H06505, 16K21732, 17H07330, 15H02161, 17H03014] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chiral systems (consisting of materials and incident radiation) respond differently to left- and right-handed circularly polarized light macroscopically. As a consequence, only chiral materials show intrinsic macroscopic optical activity, and only chiral systems generate circularly polarized light from linearly polarized incident light. In the nanoscopic regime, in contrast to this general rule for macroscopic cases, it is theoretically expected that achiral (nonchiral) systems can locally generate circularly polarized fields. Here, we report experimental evidence for that situation in achiral systems consisting of gold nanostructures and linearly polarized incident light. The local circularly polarized fields were visualized by near-field polarimetry imaging, and the spatial features of the observed circularly polarized fields were qualitatively reproduced by a simple dipole model. The present results may provide a novel technique to produce controllable circularly polarized optical fields in nanospaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available