4.5 Article

Women's and men's negative experience of child birth-A cross-sectional survey

Journal

WOMEN AND BIRTH
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 103-109

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.07.002

Keywords

Childbirth experience; Negative birth experience; Men's birth experience; Women's birth experience

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A negative birth experience may influence both women and men and can limit their process of becoming a parent. Aims: This study aimed to analyze and describe women's and men's perceptions and experiences of childbirth. Design: A cross-sectional study of women and their partners living in one Swedish county were recruited in mid pregnancy and followed up two months after birth. Women (n = 928) and men (n = 818) completed the same questionnaire that investigated new parents' birth experiences in relation to sociodemographic background and birth related variables. Results: Women (6%) and men (3%) with a negative birth experiences, experienced longer labours and more often emergency caesarean section compared to women (94%) and men (97%) with a positive birth experience. The obstetric factors that contributed most strongly to a negative birth experience were emergency caesarean and was found in women (OR 4.7, 95% CI 2.0-10.8) and men (OR 4.5, Cl 95% 1.4-17.3). In addition, pain intensity and elective caesarean section were also associated with a negative birth experiences in women. Feelings during birth such as agreeing with the statement; 'It was a pain to give birth' were a strong contributing factor for both women and men. Conclusions: A negative birth experience is associated with obstetric factors such as emergency caesarean section and negative feelings. The content of negative feelings differed between women and men. It is important to take into account that their feelings differ in order to facilitate the processing of the negative birth experience for both partners. (C) 2017 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available