4.3 Article

An energy-efficient rescheduling approach under delay perturbations for metro systems

Journal

TRANSPORTMETRICA B-TRANSPORT DYNAMICS
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 386-400

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21680566.2017.1421109

Keywords

Metro trains; rescheduling approach; regenerative braking; energy consumption

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0803300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71701013, 71525002, 71621001]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016RC051]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety [RCS2017ZJ002]
  5. Chang Jiang Chair Professorship to Tongji University in Shanghai
  6. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administration Region [PolyU 15267116]
  7. Research Committee of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University [1-ZVJV]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the increasing energy prices and environmental issues, energy conservation for metro trains has become an important research topic in recent years. The static timetable optimization approach can reduce the trains' energy consumption to a certain degree by scheduling multiple trains' movements. However, this optimization approach is prone to fail when one or some trains are delayed at stations. This paper develops an energy-efficient rescheduling approach under delay perturbations for metro trains, which aims to minimize the net energy consumption under the premise of reducing or eliminating the delay altogether. Firstly, we provide an illustrative example to describe the rescheduling problem. Furthermore, we formulate an integer programming model and design an allocation algorithm to obtain the optimal schedule. Finally, a numerical example based on the Beijing Metro Yizhuang Line shows that the developed approach can reduce the net energy consumption by 8.19% in comparison with the traditional rescheduling approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available