4.6 Article

Knowledge sharing: influences of trust, commitment and cost

Journal

JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 740-753

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED
DOI: 10.1108/13673271211262781

Keywords

Knowledge sharing; Affective commitment; Trust in colleagues; Perceived cost of knowledge sharing; Knowledge transfer; Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - This paper's aim is to examine the influence of perceived cost of sharing knowledge and affective trust in colleagues on the relationship between affective commitment and knowledge sharing. Design/methodology/approach - The methodology used was a survey of 496 employees from 15 organizations across ten industries. Findings - Affective trust in colleagues moderates the relationship between affective commitment and knowledge sharing and the relationship between cost of knowledge sharing and knowledge sharing. Research limitations/implications - Future researchers should operationalize the perceived cost of knowledge sharing construct to include other potential group barriers; for instance, politics and organizational barriers, management commitment and lack of trust. Practical implications - The findings of this study suggest that employees who value social relationships and social resources tend to view knowledge as a collectively owned commodity As such, their knowledge sharing behavior reflects the model of reciprocal social exchanges. Social implications - The results of this study indicate that an organizational culture that encourages affect-based trust between colleagues will facilitate knowledge sharing. Originality/value - The paper bridges the gap between the literature on knowledge sharing, perceived cost of knowledge sharing, affective organizational commitment and trust in a single model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available