4.5 Article

PIK3CA mutation impact on survival in breast cancer patients and in ERα, PR and ERBB2-based subgroups

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/bcr3113

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Conseil regional d'Ile-de-France
  2. Canceropole Ile-de-France
  3. Comite departemental des Hauts-de-Seine de la Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer
  4. Association pour la Recherche en Cancerologie de Saint-Cloud (ARCS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: PIK3CA is the oncogene showing the highest frequency of gain-of-function mutations in breast cancer, but the prognostic value of PIK3CA mutation status is controversial. Methods: We investigated the prognostic significance of PIK3CA mutation status in a series of 452 patients with unilateral invasive primary breast cancer and known long-term outcome (median follow-up 10 years). Results: PIK3CA mutations were identified in 151 tumors (33.4%). The frequency of PIK3CA mutations differed markedly according to hormone receptor (estrogen receptor alpha [ER alpha] and progesterone receptor [PR]) and ERBB2 status, ranging from 12.5% in the triple-negative subgroup (ER-/PR-/ERBB2-) to 41.1% in the HR+/ERBB2-subgroup. PIK3CA mutation was associated with significantly longer metastasis-free survival in the overall population (P = 0.0056), and especially in the PR-positive and ERBB2-positive subgroups. In Cox multivariate regression analysis, the prognostic significance of PIK3CA mutation status persisted only in the ERBB2-positive subgroup. Conclusions: This study confirms the high prevalence of PIK3CA mutations in breast cancer. PIK3CA mutation is an emerging tumor marker which might become used in treatment-choosing process. The independent prognostic value of PIK3CA mutation status in ERBB2-positive breast cancer patients should be now confirmed in larger series of patients included in randomized prospective ERBB2-based clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available