4.6 Review

Knowledge management in SMEs: a literature review

Journal

JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 879-903

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/13673271211276173

Keywords

Knowledge management; Small to medium-sized enterprises; Systematic review; Entrepreneurship; Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The aim of this paper is to review research on knowledge management in small and medium-sized enterprises to identify gaps in the current body of knowledge, which justify future research directions. Design/methodology/approach - The study consists of a systematic review of 36-refereed empirical articles on knowledge management and small and medium-sized enterprises. Findings - The areas of knowledge management implementation, knowledge management perception, and knowledge transfer are relatively well researched topics; whereas those of knowledge identification, knowledge storage/retention and knowledge utilisation are poorly understood. Given the prevalence of small and medium-sized enterprises there is a strong need for more research on this important topic. The future research directions proposed by the authors may help to develop a greater understanding of knowledge management in small and medium-sized enterprises. Research limitations/implications - By only using the Pro Quest database this study may not have allowed a complete coverage of all empirical articles in the field of knowledge management in small and medium-sized enterprises. Yet, it is believed that the findings provide a valuable understanding of the current situation in this research field. The study proposes a number of future research directions, which may stimulate more intensive research in this important field. Originality/value - To the best of the authors' knowledge, no systematic literature review on this topic has previously been published in academic journals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available