4.6 Article

A hybrid Decision Support System for Generation of Holistic Renovation Scenarios-Cases of Energy Consumption, Investment Cost, and Thermal Indoor Comfort

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su10041255

Keywords

building renovation; sustainable renovation; decision support systems (DSS); holistic renovation scenarios; multiple criteria decision making (MCDM); genetic algorithms (GA); energy consumption; investment cost; thermal indoor comfort

Funding

  1. Danish Innovation Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Future building renovations must rely on a holistic perspective in relation to sustainability. This paper presents a Decision Support Systems (DSS) that can be used by architects and engineering consultants to generate and evaluate the sustainability of renovation scenarios in a holistic manner during the early design stage of renovation projects. Firstly, this paper discusses both the notion of a sustainable renovation, together with various renovation approaches, towards the appreciation of the developing DSS for the generation of holistic scenarios. Secondly, it provides details about the mechanism and types of Multiple Criteria Decision Making methods to be exploited in the main body of the DSS. As such, a hybrid approach including a search algorithm with the Genetic Algorithm is used to combine and develop countless optimal scenarios. The performance of the generated scenarios is simulated and evaluated in terms criteria for Energy Consumption, Investment Cost, and Thermal Indoor Comfort. The trade-off between the criteria is addressed using the Pareto-front approach, and subsequently, the optimal scenarios are determined and selected using MCDM-based rating methods. The outcome is verified discussing a case study about an actual [recently] renovated dwelling and the top ranked generated scenarios using the DSS in this paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available