4.7 Article

CDC: Compressive Data Collection for Wireless Sensor Networks

Journal

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPDS.2014.2345257

Keywords

Compressive data collection; wireless sensor networks; compressive sensing; random compression; nonuniform random projection

Funding

  1. 973 Program [2014CB340303]
  2. National 863 Program [2013AA01A601]
  3. NSFC [61170238, 60903190, 61303202, 61073158, 61100210]
  4. STCSM Project [12dz1507400]
  5. FQRNT grant [131844]
  6. Singapore-MIT IDC [IDD61000102a, SUTD-ZJU/RES/03/2011, NRF2012EWT-EIRP002-045]
  7. Singapore NRF [CREATE E2S2]
  8. iTrust [IGDSi1305013]
  9. Singapore-MIT International Design Center [IDG31000101]
  10. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in the University (PCSIRT), China [IRT1158]
  11. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data collection is a crucial operation in wireless sensor networks. The design of data collection schemes is challenging due to the limited energy supply and the hot spot problem. Leveraging empirical observations that sensory data possess strong spatiotemporal compressibility, this paper proposes a novel compressive data collection scheme for wireless sensor networks. We adopt a power-law decaying data model verified by real data sets and then propose a random projection-based estimation algorithm for this data model. Our scheme requires fewer compressed measurements, thus greatly reduces the energy consumption. It allows simple routing strategy without much computation and control overheads, which leads to strong robustness in practical applications. Analytically, we prove that it achieves the optimal estimation error bound. Evaluations on real data sets (from the GreenOrbs, IntelLab and NBDC-CTD projects) show that compared with existing approaches, this new scheme prolongs the network lifetime by 1.5x to 2x for estimation error 5-20 percent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available