4.1 Article

Motor Imagery during Action Observation of Locomotor Tasks Improves Rehabilitation Outcome in Older Adults after Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal

NEURAL PLASTICITY
Volume 2018, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2018/5651391

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Cross-border Cooperation Program Slovenia-Italy from European Regional Development Fund [CB147]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed at determining whether the combination of action observation and motor imagery (AO + MI) of locomotor tasks could positively affect rehabilitation outcome after hip replacement surgery. Of initially 405 screened participants, 21 were randomly split into intervention group (N = 10; mean age = 64 y; AO+ MI of locomotor tasks: 30 min/day in the hospital, then 3x/week in their homes for two months) and control group (N = 11, mean age = 63 y, active controls). The functional outcomes (Timed Up and Go, TUG; Four Step Square Test, FSST; and single-and dual-task gait and postural control) were measured before (PRE) and 2 months after surgery (POST). Significant interactions indicated better rehabilitation outcome for the intervention group as compared to the control group: at POST, the intervention group revealed faster TUG (p = 0 042), FSST (p = 0 004), and dual-task fast-paced gait speed (p = 0 022), reduced swing-time variability (p = 0 005), and enhanced cognitive performance during dual tasks while walking or balancing (p < 0 05). In contrast, no changes were observed for body sway parameters (p = 0 229). These results demonstrate that AO+ MI is efficient to improve motor-cognitive performance after hip surgery. Moreover, only parameters associated with locomotor activities improved whereas balance skills that were not part of the AO+ MI intervention were not affected, demonstrating the specificity of training intervention. Overall, utilizing AO+ MI during rehabilitation is advised, especially when physical practice is limited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available