3.8 Article

Graphene Oxide Hybridized nHAC/PLGA Scaffolds Facilitate the Proliferation of MC3T3-E1 Cells

Journal

NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2432-6

Keywords

Graphene oxide; Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); Collagen; Nano-hydroxyapatite; Biodegradable porous scaffold; Bone tissue engineering

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31600753, 51201056, 51171058, 51401146]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [16JCYBJC43400]
  3. National Science Foundation of Hebei [C2017202206]
  4. Hebei Province Foundation for Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars [CL201711]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China [E2013202021, E2013202022, E2015202037]
  6. Outstanding Youth Foundation of Hebei Province of China [E2015202282]
  7. Science and Technology Correspondent Project of Tianjin [14JCTPJC00496, 15JCYBJC29900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biodegradable porous biomaterial scaffolds play a critical role in bone regeneration. In this study, the porous nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/graphene oxide (nHAC/PLGA/GO) composite scaffolds containing different amount of GO were fabricated by freeze-drying method. The results show that the synthesized scaffolds possess a three-dimensional porous structure. GO slightly improves the hydrophilicity of the scaffolds and reinforces their mechanical strength. Young's modulus of the 1.5 wt% GO incorporated scaffold is greatly increased compared to the control sample. The in vitro experiments show that the nHAC/PLGA/GO (1.5 wt%) scaffolds significantly cell adhesion and proliferation of osteoblast cells (MC3T3-E1). This present study indicates that the nHAC/PLGA/GO scaffolds have excellent cytocompatibility and bone regeneration ability, thus it has high potential to be used as scaffolds in the field of bone tissue engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available