4.8 Article

Biomolecule based fiber supercapacitor for implantable device

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages 385-392

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.011

Keywords

Supercapacitor; Fiber; Implant; In vivo; Ferritin

Funding

  1. Creative Research Initiative Center for Self-Powered Actuation
  2. DGIST R&D Program of the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning in Korea [18-NT-02]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-15-1-0089, FA2386-13-1-4119]
  4. NASA [NNX15CSS05C]
  5. Robert A. Welch Foundation [AT-0029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the growing demand for electronic medical devices for healthcare applications, we studied an implantable supercapacitor that can operate in an implantable electronic device. Here, we report a flexible implantable fiber supercapacitor for an in vivo energy storage device. The fiber supercapacitor has a high flexibility and a high potential to be applied in an implant device because the fiber can be implanted in the blood vessel and the wound can be stitched with the fiber-like suture. The fiber electrodes were fabricated in a biscrolling process that trapped poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS)/ferritin nanoclusters within multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWNT) sheets that provide mechanical strength and electrical conductivity. In addition, the supercapacitor is biocompatible because the MWNT sheets are coated with biocompatible materials such as PEDOT: PSS and ferritin. The areal capacitance of the PEDOT:PSS/ferritin/MWNT fiber supercapacitor was 32.9 mF/cm(2) in a phosphate buffered saline solution, and the areal energy density was 0.82 mu Wh/cm(2); these values are 52 times higher than that of the guest-free MWNT yarn. The supercapacitor operated well in a mouse and exhibited excellent biocompatibility; the capacitance was maintained above 90% in the mouse after eight days.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available