4.8 Article

Progressive contact-separate triboelectric nanogenerator based on conductive polyurethane foam regulated with a Bennet doubler conditioning circuit

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 10-18

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.038

Keywords

Triboelectric nanogenerator; Conductive polyurethane foam; Energy harvesting; Bennet doubler conditioning circuit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scavenging the energy of human motions has attracted widespread attentions with the development of wearable electronics. This paper for the first time proposed a progressive triboelectric nanogenerator based on macro-triangle-prism-shaped conductive polyurethane (PU) foam and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) film, which occupy the top and bottom spots of the triboelectric table respectively. The proposed macro-structured conductive PU foam also integrates the functions of spring, spacer and electrode. Thanks to the innovative structures and chosen of the materials, an extended current pulse width is obtained. A maximum RMS power density of 100 nJ/cm(2)/tap was obtained with a 60 M Omega resistive load and press force of 10 N@5 Hz. By regulating the TENG with a Bennet doubler conditioning circuit, the ubiquitous voltage saturation phenomenon when charging a storage capacitor using full-wave rectifiers is avoided. Moreover, the energy per cycle, charging efficiency and totally stored energy can be exponentially pumped up. With a Bennet circuit charging a 5 nF capacitor, a harvested energy density of similar to 710 nJ/cm(2)/tap was obtained when voltage across the capacitor was 400 V. Putting the device under sole within 25 human steps, the totally stored energy was 0.43 mJ with a Bennet circuit, 3.6 times higher than that using a full-wave rectifier (0.12 mJ). The Bennet was proven better for regulating the triboelectric nanogenerators with long operation-time compared to the classical full-wave rectifier.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available