4.8 Article

Hematite dodecahedron crystals with high-index facets grown and grafted on one dimensional structures for efficient photoelectrochemical H-2 generation

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 50, Issue -, Pages 331-338

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.039

Keywords

Hematite dodecahedron with high-index facets; One dimensional nanoflakes; Charge transportation; Light absorption; Solar water splitting

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21622310, 21573264, 21633013]
  2. ERC
  3. DFG
  4. Erlangen DFG cluster of excellence Engineering of Advanced Materials [EXC315]
  5. DFG funCOS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fe2O3 polyhedrons are one of the most promising morphologies for photoelectrochemical water splitting. In spite of recent reports on the successful synthesis of various Fe2O3 polyhedrons, the fabrication of defined photo-electrodes by anchoring the polyhedron in a suitable configuration remains a great challenge. Herein, we introduce a synthetic strategy to prepare Fe2O3 dodecahedrons with high-index {112} facets directly anchored on a one dimensional Fe2O3 nanoflake ({110} facets) electrode. Key is that the Fe2O3 nanoflakes act as seeds for the initiation of the growth of dodecahedral nanocrystals from an iron nitrate solution. The initial single crystals consist of Fe3O4 with exposed {110} basal surfaces that then in a thermal step can be converted to hematite with {112} facets. The resulting single crystal (bi-crystal) hematite photoanode demonstrates a high efficiency for solar water splitting with an excellent photoresponse due to the synergistic effects of direct grafting of the light harvesting and reactive polyhedron and the 1D transport geometry. Under optimized conditions the hematite polyhedrons on nanoflake-structure show photocurrent densities of 2.4 mA cm(-2) at 1.23 V-RHE and 3.5 mA cm(-2) at 1.5 V-RHE under AM 1.5 G simulated sunlight.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available